Main Menu
Home
News
Blog
Links
Contact Us
Search
MamboServer
MamboForge
Administrator
Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?
No account yet? Create one
Who's Online
We have 1 guest online
Polls
Should vehicles be banned from City beaches?
  
Syndicate
   
Open letter to the Caller Times
Contributed by Coastin   
Monday, 19 March 2007
Dear Caller Times Editorial Board,

I have trouble seeing why educated people in the news media say stuff like this:

"TRT proposed a $30 million amusement park, while the Padre Island resort would have been $1.5 billion in development."

Excerpt from Corpus Christi Caller Times article:
http://www.caller.com/ccct/local_news/article/0,1641,CCCT_811_5426757,00.html

Bayfront development - We're back to square 1 By Dan Kelley and Denise Malan Caller-Times March 18, 2007


Please show us some solid evidence that a Canadian Developer was really going to build this reported $1.5 billion resort in the Packery Channel area. The Caller Times has made this assertion repeatedly. Surely you check more than one source before telling your readers that something is true. When you state something over and over again as if it were true without checking that there is credible evidence you do a great disservice to your readers and the Caller Times as a “News Media Outlet”.

Last Updated ( Monday, 19 March 2007 )
Read more...
Welcome to Packery.Com
Written by Web Master   
Sunday, 29 October 2006
If you are new to the subject of Packery Channel some of this will not make any sense. If you are familiar with this controversial tax funded, real estate speculation fueled, environmental channel project you likely know little of it makes any sense.

I have included some links here to help inform you about Packery Channnel:

Introduction to Pachery Channel
Texas Inlet Facts
Geomadre
What the Peer Review Really Says
Aerial images with comments from Dr. Watson
Index of Scientific and Engineering Information and Links to Articles and Publications
US Army Corps of Engineers Packery info site
US Army Corps of Engineers Packery Archive site
Packery.Com Archive Site


Last Updated ( Monday, 19 March 2007 )
Imagine what 1.5 billion dollar resort will look like
Written by Administrator   
Saturday, 28 October 2006

Padre Island real estate speculator Paul Schexnailder 1.5 billion dollar promissory note - in Paul we trust?
Special thanks to the Dredge Report for use of the Paul Schexnailder 1.5 billion dollar promissory note.

Ever wonder what 1.5 billion dollars would buy in a resort facility?

With all the hype touting a 1.5 billion dollar resort in exchange for closing off beach access to vehicular traffic and giving up exclusive vending rights to property owners adjacent to that section of beach, one must be curious as to what 1.5 billion dollars would buy. Resorts in exotic places like Atlantic City, Los Vegas and many other upscale resort areas generally tend to be in that price range. The same 1.5 billion dollar figurer to build a resort comes to light in some developing countries as well.

The pro-beach-closure campaign tries to frame it in their advertising by asking us to imagine all the benefits of this kind of investment on North Padre Island (over 15 years). They want us to imagine all the really cool stuff we could get, including lots of jobs. Yeah, just close your eyes and imagine it... Now imagine that Paul Schexnailder has a developer waiting in the wings to plop down 1.5 billion worth of resort facility in that tiny space around Packery Channel!

The City Council apparently knows the difficulty in trying to raise 1.5 billion dollars, as they have written into the resolution they adopted regarding creating an ordinance (none exists for us to examine yet) that they will give Schexnailder five years to come up with some money to build his resort.

You may remember Paul Schexnailder, the guy who the Packery Channel TIF promoters all said would be responsible for buying the 10 million dollars in bonds to cover the City's share of the Packery Channel costs.

How well did that work out?

It didn't and the City had to devote Skip Noe (then an assistant City Manager) to selling the bonds over several months. His salary was paid for by us taxpayers, something that Paul Schexnailder should have been held accountable for. He wasn't and that should be a sign of things to come. It's fun to imagine all the neat stuff we could get if Paul Schexnailder keeps his word this time, but I wouldn't hold my breath expecting it to happen that way. It is far is easier to visualize how Padre Island real estate speculators would profit from selling lots in the effected area.

In Paul We Trust?
Last Updated ( Monday, 19 March 2007 )
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 4 of 7
 
Copyright © 2004 nazwa firmy
Projekt i wykonanie Web Design Studio
Copyright 2000 - 2004 Miro International Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.